A Confused Thought
Is micro or macro more important? If big things occur as a consequence of small things initially occurred, then how would you classify the action of imposing a certain level of interest rate to control the whole economy? In this term, it's like, big things happen first and lead to the operation of micro firms...Doesn't it sound weird? because this system somehow portrays a flow that goes against the nature of how things should happen, starting from small... or in other words, it obviously shows how the world is being controlled by an autonomy. That's creepy.
But of course, research agrees upon this whole thing occur as a result of the world's evolution. Mainly let's just focus on the financial system. But somehow, it shows as if it is not the evolution that has taken into place for the past decades but more of a growing influence from an autonomy to persuade the world into abiding to a single financial rule with on the surface motives such as to generate and achieve further financial globalisation that could mean a lot to the current and future growth of the world economy.
Well, this whole argument might be a weak one without good readings and reviews. It's like the argument whether the world globalisation exactly occur in 1500 or during 19th century (1870). And however strong one side use the founding of Manila in 1517 as the main event that sparked globalisation, there will still be great comments and counter arguments for that (and proves the other side's victory).
Oh well...
My point is, this whole economic thing is worth to think about. Because I truly believe that if you want to control the world, or if you want to make any sorts of a change to the WORLD , political issue is number two in the list, but Economics is on the top priority. You know Economics, you can control everything. Easy said. Thank you.
ps: To anyone who's reading, I am looking for any good Islamic Economics (History) readings. Or any good readings that highlighted the interest rate application in the world financial system. Do share if you know any...May God bless us all ;) insyaAllah :)
But of course, research agrees upon this whole thing occur as a result of the world's evolution. Mainly let's just focus on the financial system. But somehow, it shows as if it is not the evolution that has taken into place for the past decades but more of a growing influence from an autonomy to persuade the world into abiding to a single financial rule with on the surface motives such as to generate and achieve further financial globalisation that could mean a lot to the current and future growth of the world economy.
Well, this whole argument might be a weak one without good readings and reviews. It's like the argument whether the world globalisation exactly occur in 1500 or during 19th century (1870). And however strong one side use the founding of Manila in 1517 as the main event that sparked globalisation, there will still be great comments and counter arguments for that (and proves the other side's victory).
Oh well...
My point is, this whole economic thing is worth to think about. Because I truly believe that if you want to control the world, or if you want to make any sorts of a change to the WORLD , political issue is number two in the list, but Economics is on the top priority. You know Economics, you can control everything. Easy said. Thank you.
ps: To anyone who's reading, I am looking for any good Islamic Economics (History) readings. Or any good readings that highlighted the interest rate application in the world financial system. Do share if you know any...May God bless us all ;) insyaAllah :)
Comments